View Single Post
Old 09-30-2008, 11:54 PM   #14 (permalink)
ConnClark
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
The turbo in the exhaust thing is being researched, for instance here: Put A Tiger In Your Exhaust

As for the turbo-compounding of aircraft engines, the amusing part is that the engineers eventually figured out that the turbine was more efficient if they removed the piston engine altogether - and so the turboprop was born :-)
Actually the Napier nomad was more efficient than a turbo prop. The turbo prop has the advantage of using less refined hence cheaper fuel. It also has the advantage of less complexity and less wear and tear due to lack of recipricating motion. A turbo prop is more economical but not more fuel efficient.
__________________
  Reply With Quote