View Single Post
Old 03-24-2021, 07:59 PM   #85 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,467

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,213
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post
So solar ain't an option and now pedal power ain't either. What then is an option? I guess not do anything is an option.
I didn't say it isn't an option. The conversation was never about options. The title of the thread implies a discussion about the cost/benefit intersection and whether it's reasonable to put PV on a hybrid. In other words, doing so needs to be the best use of resources given all other known alternative uses of those resources.

Human powered transportation is already a highly developed technology, mostly taking form in a bicycle. A person can't generate enough power to run the accessories in a car, let alone propel it. A fairly fit person might be able to sustain 200 watts of output, but don't expect to arrive at the destination in a non-persperated state.

To recap, PV on a hybrid can work, just as human power can, but the cost/benefit isn't there for 99.999% of people. That means for those who want it, they will need to engineer it themselves, because there's no profit incentive to make an expensive vehicle that nobody wants to buy.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Isaac Zachary (03-24-2021)