Thread: nuclear plants
View Single Post
Old 10-01-2008, 03:33 PM   #59 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by trebuchet03 View Post
I really don't know why de-icing is such a big deal in this thread...
It's not a big deal at all: it just came up as one of the possible difficulties/extra costs of building wind turbines in Saskatechewan. The argument was that "renewables" of various sorts are less capital intensive than building nuclear plants. But that's a conclusion that comes from figuring the basic cost of one wind turbine (or a bunch of solar cells for your roof), while neglecting all the infrastructure costs that are included in the price of a nuclear plant. Do an honest comparison, figuring in all the costs (including the environmental ones!), and you find that "renewables" cost a lot more than some people would like to think.
  Reply With Quote