View Single Post
Old 04-13-2021, 02:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Vekke
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
Here is my audi A4 b6 1.9 tdi measurement data for different boost maps. There is AFR2 map which is latest and currently in use.
AFR1 map which was "full boost" map
and one run for comparison with stock map of the car what just the ecu map does for efficiency in steady form of driving. With diesels I have limited the IQ to some number. In this car that 15mg gives nice results. With this car the numbers you see again on the memo are speeds in certain measurement points of the route. HIghest and lowest values.

Test route is exatly same as I had in the ID3 testing. I think in this I have measured the distance from google maps.

In the end I am measuring time it takes for the route. and from that I can calculate the AVG speeds and from those the difference in needed HP can be calculated. Again I have trusted these results to be reliable even the difference between these two maps is low 2,2%. Again you can make your own calculations based on the raw data available. If you don`t release the raw data then any measurements or results are not valid. This is true also to measurements done by the oems as you can always get results you want by filtering the results.

__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote