View Single Post
Old 05-19-2021, 04:37 PM   #52 (permalink)
ksa8907
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-a...ed-micro-r.jpgGreg Fadler, Group Manager, GM Aerodynamics Engineering, shared the following with MOTOR TREND:
* aero drag constitutes about 30% to 40% of energy consumed on the freeway
* 20% more at 70-mph than at 60-mph
* ( Between 60 and 70, drag increases by 36.1% )
* delta-36.1% / delta- 20% mpg = 10% = 5.54% ( similar to 1963 GM Lab metric for 70-mph aerodynamics )
* the Tahoe's Cd 0.379, vs Cd 0.416 for the typical SUV means 1+ mpg on the highway.
* the Tahoe hybrid's Cd 0.36 comes from its airdam, fascia, and mirrors.
* I couldn't find an official frontal area for the Chevy/GMC/Cadillac variants of this vehicle. Perhaps 34.88 sq-ft ( 3.24 meters-squared ) would be a reasonable working number.
* a curb weight of 5,907- pounds is given.
* from my own experience pulling trailers, I would suggest that any added weight and rolling resistance penalty of an aero trailer is essentially meaningless, compared to the aero advantage.
Certainly not empirical evidence but when we moved south, we towed a 4x8 uhaul trailer behind our hybrid (denali, so none of the aero treatments) and mileage was unaffected, still did 18mpg at 80mph. We also had two bicycles on the roof so maybe aero was much better with the trailer and bicycles brought it back down to zero net gain/loss.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ksa8907 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-19-2021)