View Single Post
Old 05-28-2021, 02:57 AM   #45 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,805

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,326
Thanked 4,476 Times in 3,441 Posts
Perhaps I've mentioned it before, but our kids are going to wonder why we call them "standard" transmissions when automatic is more common.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I just read [yet another] article about the disappearance of manual transmissions from North American new cars:


Last of the manuals: Automatic transmissions may be the norm, but some cars still let you pick your gears

And I practically fell out of my chair when the writer did NOT simply regurgitate the false statement that modern automatics are more efficient than manuals.

He gets the nuance:

I'd guess it's 1 out of 20 auto journos / bloggers who actually understands this.

The rest just look at the EPA ratings and tell readers that the CVT is better. Sigh.
Absolutely true, which is why I was dismayed when I briefly (1 month) owned an automatic Subaru and expected to beat EPA ratings as severely as I had in my previous 5-speed manual. It felt more sluggish and got much worse fuel economy.

It does seem that most automatics have taller top gears than their manual counterparts. The automatic version of my TSX will get better highway economy than my car no matter what I do. I actually get better fuel economy in deadlocked Portland traffic than highway because the gearing is so miserable.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote