It is not misinformation, it is nuanced information that you have generalised or misunderstood such that it is now misinformation.
If you misinterpret something from what is written and then claim that is misinformation then the misinformation is on your part not mine.
Quote:
|
Where is any evidence that solar cars employed lift? That is, they wanted lift? I've not seen any at all - just the opposite in fact.
|
I think this is supporting evidence to what I said earlier, inferring additional meaning to words and then claiming that the evidence does not meet the additional meaning you have added is not correct.
The fact is that for increased efficiency, solar teams have pitched the nose up to increase lift slightly. That is not misinformation, or misrepresentation it is fact, the sources show that.
That doesn't mean it was specifically designed to lift, or that they wanted it to lift significantly, I don't believe I stated anything suggesting otherwise, and the sources listed in the quoted post support my interpretation. However, they employed the front end lift to increase cruise speed.
All my posts are backed with evidence and thought, every post is thought through carefully. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that the evidence supporting my ideas fully proves the concept. It is always support to the theory, not proof and should never be taken as such unless explicitly stated. No additional meaning should be taken from posts and all posts should be taken specifically and without generalisation.