View Single Post
Old 06-18-2021, 01:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
jakobnev
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,559

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
Thanks: 68
Thanked 640 Times in 404 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
The energy at the blade-air interface must be lower than that at the road-to-tire interface due to energy loss in the tire, gears, wheel bearings, lower sprocket, chain, upper sprocket, jack-shaft bearings, then the blades themselves.
Sit down and enjoy this moment of enlightenment.

Power is force times velocity.

For the wheels it's simple: The velocity is just the difference in velocity of the wheels and the ground.

For the propeller it is just as simple: The velocity is just the difference in speed between the propeller and... (this is the facepalm moment!) the air!

The propeller doesn't give a hoot about ground speed!


Let's say we wanted to go 10m/s down a 5m/s wind and were transferring 100N of force.

We harvest 100N*10m/s = 1kW at the wheels.

The useful power of our propeller needs to be: 100N*5m/s = 500W.

Ergo (I love that word) we need a total system efficiency of 50%, including all losses, that is very very much not over unity, no magic needed!

Propeller efficiencies can be 82-92% according to the internet.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote