Quote:
Originally Posted by ennored
That's how I understand it. Traveling at say, 10 MPH, with a 7 MPH tailwind, you have 10 MPH of groundspeed to overcome a 3 MPH headwind.
|
1) if the 'phenomena' of Rick Cavallero are of aerodynamic origin, then they are governed by the same principles as all aerodynamic phenomena.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If tested in a laboratory, I believe that you will find that:
A) the vehicle ground velocity never exceeded the wind speed.
B) at sub-critical Reynolds number, laminar boundary layer, all flow across the vehicle was separated.
C) the 'tattle' at the vehicle's nose was being pulled backwards into the low-pressure turbulent wake of the separated flow.
D) the backwards-facing tattle gave the 'appearance' of headwind, when in fact, that never existed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Believing that a 'headwind' actually existed, Rick Cavallero's mind made the leap, concluding that he'd done the impossible, re-writing fluid mechanics and thermodynamics.
' Man believes what he wants to believe.'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If anyone wants to spend a little time studying Sir Issac Newton's second law, pertaining to force/ mass/ velocity/ time/ momentum/ inertia/ impulse, you'll see that this theory of Cavallero's was dead before it was ever mentioned.