Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
Flogging a dead horse much?
"In the United States, a design patent is a form of legal protection granted to the ornamental design of a functional item."
Note: not an idea, an ornamental design. In the US, you cannot patent an idea - well, according to the US patent office, anyway. And hey, what would they know? They're only the US patent office!
This is why Aerohead continues ad infinitum to post stuff here that is wrong, misleading or confused. He never, ever takes a correction. In fact, this business about patents is a perfect example. Aerohead wrote that you can patent ideas in the US.
Simply wrong.
You'd think he agree he made a mistake, wouldn't you. But no, not a bit of it.
 |
Perhaps you're the only person I'll ever experience in my lifetime, capable of divorcing human thought from the human creative process.
'Ideation' was actually a formal concept presented within the curriculum in mechanical engineering.
After delivering a concrete example, counterfactual to your thesis, it means nothing to you.
Where is the mistake?
What would I be agreeing with?
What is wrong with fact.
How is fact misleading?
How do you arrive at confused?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And then we arrive your counter -attack:
It's now grown from 'some' to 'most' all the way to 'ad infinitum'
You could try to say things which sound more stupid, however I can't imagine how you'd succeed.
The rest of us here at the forum are stuck communicating through the use of written word.
I'm going to go for help. I can't deal with you any longer.