Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary
The problem for me is that there are politicians that support the other side. So which politician is right?
|
The one who places fewer barriers to the implementation of practical solutions, instead of imposing problems in order to sell a false solution.
Quote:
|
Pump a lot of carbon to the surface, burn it and not expect some sort of environmental effect doesn't seem logical.
|
Raising all hell to prevent some bio-remediation approaches which could lead to a much lesser disruption to the average Joe's life also doesn't seem logical, yet it's what most politicians seem to endorse nowadays in a worldwide basis. This is why sometimes I take some global warming claims with a grain of salt, when practical solutions which seem to have fewer downsides are neglected in order to promote fancier approaches which in turn may become too expensive and unpractical.