Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary
The problem for me is that there are politicians that support the other side. So which politician is right?
Global warming just seems logical to me I guess. Pump a lot of carbon to the surface, burn it and not expect some sort of environmental effect doesn't seem logical.
|
Before it was global cooling. What if the effect is an exact balance of cooling and heating?
I personally think the earth is a very buffered system. Input in one area causes a reaction in another to stabilize everything. It just couldn't have been here for so long and survived the cruelty of space, there just has to be more to it. Just ignoring in the models for changes in how clouds might increase with increasing CO2 reflecting more solar energy out into space. If a model is made, a guess has to be made, and the guess is always to make it worse not better.
Also warmer is always terrible. To me it seems the best land masses will actually be improved for humans by a warmer climate overall. Maybe we lose some aeras over here, but gain twice as much over there. So we adapt if it all does go as bad as some proje8.