View Single Post
Old 07-07-2021, 05:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
AeroMcAeroFace
Long time lurker
 
AeroMcAeroFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Posts: 218
Thanks: 110
Thanked 153 Times in 119 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post
I don't think the downforce converts to more traction linearly. Maybe it would if you could size the tire as downforce is increased or decreased. In other words there's a point where traction increase isn't as much as the amount of weight added.

However, inertial weight does convert to inertia linearly. Double the weight and you double the inertia.




"This graph can provide a lot of information. As you can see, the lateral force coefficient actually decreases by increasing vertical load." http://racingcardynamics.com/racing-...lateral-force/



But those graphs suggest that there should be proportionally more tyre grip.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post

Why do big heavy vehicles take longer to stop even if they have enough braking power to lock the wheels?
I thought the reason heavy vehicles take longer to stop is higher tyre pressures, and harder rubber, less grippy compounds. But maybe it isn't linear, those graphs suggest better lateral grip to vertical load ratios at lower loadings. (not necessarily the same as braking but I am assuming they are)

According to those graphs, it would seem that reducing weight can increase your cornering speed due to the tyres being proportionally more grippy, and give you more grip proportionally than adding downforce. Of course downforce comes with no increase in mass, so is still better for grip.

Last edited by AeroMcAeroFace; 07-07-2021 at 05:30 AM..
  Reply With Quote