[aerohead]

It's just an objective observation based upon the presentation. A rational response.
Something which has been formally addressed as a specific topic in peer-reviewed, top-tier scientific journals and books over the decades. Something of great concern to scientists.
There's all the makings of pseudo-science, hence the bad press.
I invite all to check out SCIENCE or NATURE. They're extremely expensive, but you get what you paid for.
Anyone who's read real science, will recognize it when they see it.
Successful defense of Suspicious Observer will have to be one with full transparency and convincing scientific argument.
I'm no authority, but I know some of the things which have survived the scrutiny of the specialists. They set a very high bar for what can pass for science.
S-O hasn't passed the smell test.