Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
|
1) there's a presumption of causality between solar weather and earthquakes, unrecognized by the entire scientific community.
2) there's another assumption that GlobalSecurity.org would know anything about earthquakes, or the significance of any space-launched scientific monitoring equipment package.
3) that Ben Davidson had anything to do with precipitating a Chinese space- probe program is quite dubious and would require better evidence.
4) the shown diagram does not provide geographic specificity, as to latitude and longitude ( to arcsecond precision ) of each predicted event.
5) the table does not include other factors, definitely known to be associated with seismological events, which might also explain observed events.
6) the Sun's mean average magnetic flux is quite weak, and falls of as the square of the distance between Sun and Earth. The solar wind travels at variable-velocity, with corotating interactive regions of compressions, shockwaves, rarifactions, reverberations , with a mean average of 892,800-mph, but it will be whatever it is.
7) magnetic Parker spirals are cast off as a function of the Sun's Coriolis effect, and their 'position-location' cannot be predicted spatially or temporally, with respect to how they might intercept the orbit of Earth. In order to have any chance to 'hit' the Earth, they need to leave the Sun near the solar ecliptic.
8) liquid-phase, or plastic-phase magnetic materials cannot carry mechanical stress.
9) the inertia of Earth's lithosphere would absolutely dampen the effect of any transient, passing magnetic space anomaly attempting to act, magnetically, on magnetite or magnetofossils incorporated into Earth's tectonic plates.
10) take a rare-earth magnet from a computer hard drive and hold it near dirt, and see if dirt dislodges itself and flies into the air to cling to the magnet. This is essentially what Ben Davidson is asking you to believe.