View Single Post
Old 08-12-2021, 07:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,460

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe_Hybrid View Post
its pretty much a flat grade pretty much FLOORING it from 0 to 45 nets about 20-22


going slowly from 0 to 45 is a net loss of 9-10mpg it will read about 13-15mpg on the fuel meter whole time tell i reach speed ( 47-48mph) then jump to 23-29 on the meter
We've all misunderstood your testing scenario. Our assumption is that you were holding a steady cruising speed, and the slower speed yielded worse fuel economy than a faster cruising speed.

You're describing acceleration, which is a rate of speed change. Speed is a constant number, like 45 MPH.

Gasoline engines are typically much more fuel efficient (power per unit of fuel) when operating around 75% throttle and around 2,500 RPM. The engine is very inefficient at lower throttle openings (slow acceleration).

It took an eternity staring at this before everything made sense to me, but it shows power per unit of gasoline in a typical engine.



There's hardly any penalty in efficiency by going full throttle, but plenty of inefficiency at 50% or lower throttle opening across the useful RPM range.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
freebeard (08-12-2021), Gasoline Fumes (08-15-2021), Isaac Zachary (08-13-2021), Piwoslaw (04-04-2022)