Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
So Aerohead's Victorian answer of errors, erosion, little floods, great floods, wind, is open to not being accepted by main stream science.
Hopefully what ever caused it is only a once in millions of years kind of thing.
|
* From Vaagisha Singh's 'lifestyle' article, it doesn't appear that anyone but Peak et al. have anything invested in this hypothesis.
* Another unpopular notion, a PhD candidate can be 100% 'wrong' about their hypotheses and still receive a doctorate. The jury they go up against is looking for performance characteristics outside the specifics of their investigations which demonstrate a command of 'process,' regardless of outcome.
* PhD James Hansen shared that he was 100%, completely wrong about atmospheric heat on Venus, yet that didn't stand in the way of his receiving a PhD..