View Single Post
Old 09-24-2021, 11:33 AM   #26 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,924
Thanks: 24,012
Thanked 7,231 Times in 4,657 Posts
an 18-degree example

Years ago, I graphically analyzed Hucho's 2nd-Edition Figure 4.59, which comes from SAE Paper 810185, by Buchheim et al..
I've done a linear interpolation between the 27% aft-body and 36% aft-body, tested and reported in Figure 4.59.
An 18-degree drag minimum aft-body rear slope angle occurs, approximately, with a 32% aft-body, @ Cd 0.436.
Should a spoiler be added to the contour:
* the wake area would be increased
* flow separating at the top of the added spoiler, would be more horizontal, directed 'away' from the wake
* the flow would be at a higher velocity
* the flow would be at a lower static pressure
* communicating this lower pressure into the wake could lower base pressure
* increasing pressure drag
* increasing overall drag
* at normal posted speed limits, any reduced rear lift might be statistically meaningless
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona, with a 41.7% aft-body, exhibited its lowest drag with the roof rolling into a backlight angle of 18-degrees. The presence of the reflexed boot ( trunklid ) created a departure angle of 15.5-degrees, for an indicated Cd 0.270.
The same roof, rolling into a constant 12-degee backlight and 'fastback' came in at Cd 0.275. The trailing edge of the 'fastback' actually delivers the flow 'above' the streamlined pathway, both increasing wake area, plus re-accelerating the flow.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
tomi_k (09-24-2021)