View Single Post
Old 10-20-2021, 10:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
type-III

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Do you have figures for the Type III Notchback/Fastback/Squareback?

One could remove the trunk lid from the Notchback and fabricobble an enclosed and raised lid like the Jetta, from the cut-off end of a Squareback roof. It could fit against the stock glass like the cowl induction hood on a Camaro.
I've only got a blueprint for the fastback, and I'm uncertain of its actual Cd. I've seen Cd 0.50 attributed to it. Hucho shows a very small image for the notchback, used as a wind tunnel calibration model, but it's useless when photo-enlarged.
If a modification, in any way changes the relative length of the aft-body, in relation to the length of the car, the new 'roofline' contour would have to be based upon the new relationship.
The Golf/ Rabbit has an active aft-body length of 16.25%.
To create the Jetta, it gets a little over ten ( 10 ) inches added length, increasing the aft-body percentage to 33.43%.
And not so oddly enough, both the Golf and Jetta hit their drag minimums when their aft-body contour passes through the Mair' boat-tail transition / 'slow' template pathway.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
freebeard (10-20-2021)