View Single Post
Old 10-20-2021, 06:33 PM   #38 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
drag penalty comparison ( sort of )

I dredged up a couple of cars which share similar curved-roof length percentages.
The Ford / Merkur-Scorpio 2-door, and VW 2000.
Both have around 38% aft-body, Cd 0.33, and Cd 0.25, respectively.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*The Ford starts with a 25-degree fastback ( as measured from the horizontal ).
* The 'notchback' shelf / step is added, relaxing the rear slope to 19.5-degrees.
* A lower rear spoiler is added, increasing height and length, relaxing the slope angle further, to 16.4-degrees.
* Finally, the upper wing is added, creating a 14-degree slope angle off the backlight within an inch of the 'fast' template, and Cd 0.33.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Volkswagen just goes for the throat, with a simple non-porous fastback, of 14-degrees downslope angle, with a perfect match to Wolfgang Klemperer's Cd 0.15 Basic Body contour of 1922, coming in at Cd 0.25, 70.4 - inches ( 1,788mm) short of Klemperer's long-tail total length.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Klemperer's tail reaches a maximum rear slope angle of 24.5-degrees, exceeding Mair's recommended 22-degrees at 89% tail length.
This appears to be the same contour Toyota has chosen for all their Prius variants, since the Gen-II. Which, on the Prius, also happens to match Mair's transition region to 22-degrees rear slope.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 10-20-2021 at 06:39 PM.. Reason: add data
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
tomi_k (10-20-2021)