View Single Post
Old 11-12-2021, 04:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
abbreviated nose

Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
Thank you Aerohead for putting this all in one spot.

I assume all of these radius's are modeled on a 90 degree return angle on a flat plane and not some complex curve tapered teardrop form with a NACA foil number.

Let's say one takes a symmetrical cord foil and cuts the fish head off at the thickest point, then puts a 2 inch radius at corners.

How much would that alter the drag coefficient?

See attached study.
* In Walter Lay's 1933 research, he takes his Cd 0.12 long-tail and sticks a near-vertical windshielded forebody onto it. The drag degrades to Cd 0.35 ( his model #10 ).
* His model # 14, with more laid back windshield is Cd 0.30.
* Model # 18, with the most windshield rake is Cd 0.12, same as 'optimum' nose.
This is 3-D flow, and there is some 'forebody' leading up to the maximum cross-section, so it's conditional.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
kach22i (11-12-2021)