[aerohead]

It doesn't come across as 'opinion'.
A 'greening' planet is 'meaningless' in the context of climate change.
There's an implication that anything green is equal to any other thing which is green.
Clear-cut of green deforestation of the Amazonian rain forest and replacement with a green monoculture soybean and cattle production for export to China somehow equals what was destroyed.
Guatemalan sugar cane 'likes' global warming, while Guatemalan cane cutters drop dead in the field due to the rising heat index. All's good.
An acre of grass = an acre of Douglas Fir.
Tropical forest = palm oil plantations.
Perhaps it's not helpful to tell people about the bright side of global warming. It's so overshadowed by negatives, as to make the positives statistically insignificant.
It's dangerous. And it smells just like a fossil-fuel lobbyist at the federal level.