View Single Post
Old 12-16-2021, 10:03 PM   #550 (permalink)
oil pan 4
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Moving, or even reversing polarity, has no bearing on the strength of the field. Only its orientation.
There is zero evidence of elevated cosmic ray- induced cosmogenesis observed for 'ANY' magnetic excursion, or reversal over the past 150-million years.
Lack of increased cosmogenesis indicates no loss or decrease of the magnetic field flux.
Observation is complete opposite of what you assume.
As the poles have moved over the last 160 years it's gotten weaker, its moved more in the last 20 years than the previous 120 years and also weakened more in the last 20 years than the past 120.
So what makes you think as the poles move the magnetic field won't lose strength?
The gps satellites are up about 12,000 miles, they could quite easily be outside of the earth's protective field while the atmosphere is still quite well protected.
Can you assume that things 12,000 miles up will be protected?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-20-2021)