View Single Post
Old 01-18-2022, 09:43 AM   #27 (permalink)
Piotrsko
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,062
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,112 Times in 981 Posts
Hmmm 449.237 wh/mi is only slightly better than my ranger at it's calculated 453, AND said ranger was noted to be as efficient as a common clay brick.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-31-2022)