View Single Post
Old 01-20-2022, 05:56 PM   #16 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,482

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,219
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're happy getting half the fuel economy then good for you!
It's not as simple as infrastructure not being designed with enough capacity. For one example, there's the "if you build it, they will come" problem. Make traffic flow easily between city and suburbs, and you simply extend out the suburbs, increase traffic and we're back to rush hour gridlock.

Another problem is that infrastructure built to handle peak capacity will be severely underutilized off-peak. The gridlock that occurs in cities encourages some people to modify when they choose to travel, carpool, or take mass transit to avoid congestion.

I'm not arguing for creating gridlock, only saying that it isn't a simple problem a couple geniuses can solve.

I kinda think commuting is outdated anyhow because most city jobs can accommodate distributed work rather than centralizing into a single location. Between that, and increasing automation, large gains in efficiency should be possible.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote