View Single Post
Old 02-16-2022, 06:19 PM   #76 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,333
Thanks: 24,453
Thanked 7,394 Times in 4,789 Posts
OilPan4's correct assumption

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
You have argued in the past:



You contradicted oilpan4's (correct) assertion that a lighter Model 3 would be more efficient. This paper does not support that contradiction. It clearly shows that the heavier the car is, the more energy it uses per mile regardless of the effects of regenerative braking:



You seem to be confusing efficiency of the movement of energy from battery to wheels with efficiency of energy per distance traveled. They are two different things.
1) I can't contradict an assumption of unproven 'correctness.'
2) Nowhere does the paper illustrate the 'small' Volvo V40 SUV with additional mass.
3) The only 'heavier' car would be the S80 or XC90, neither of which are germane to the V40.
4) The V40 can only be compared to itself at a different mass, which is not illustrated. This is the premise for the comment about the Tesla Model 3.
5) When you see Volvo's 'solution' to the V40 inertia issue you my want to reconsider your remarks.
6) Do the math!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote