Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
I either don't understand the assertion, or my comment about a system that captures less than 100% of the input energy is less efficient than not spending that energy is correct.
It would be nice to have more than 25% solar>electricity conversion. It would be nice to have a fusion reaction that can harvest the energy in productive ways. Thorium might be a good bridge technology. The future will be amazingly unpredictable.
|
No one's going to understand until they do the math.