View Single Post
Old 02-21-2022, 04:44 PM   #655 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,228
Thanks: 24,375
Thanked 7,357 Times in 4,757 Posts
opposing views

https://www.hcn.org/articles/climate...cos-rio-grande
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Only false science censors opposing views.
New mexico is where people go during rapid climate change and world wide disasters, we had the first high rise condos known to man. This part of new mexico is one of 2 locations in the lower 48 continuously inhabited for the last 12,000 year. Not going anywhere anytime soon.
If opposing views lack scientific rigor, they self-destruct on their own. They can not survive the rigor of scientific examination. They don't need any help from censors. Self-inflicted wounds.
'False' science is structurally impossible.
Science is 'science' because it's 'scientific.'
Things not scientific would fall under a different rubric.
Pseudo-science is an example.
A 'scientist' using raw data would have to be put into a contextual framework before anything reasonable discussion could proceed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote