Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Just curious to those with a catastrophist prediction, at what approximate year should we begin to see declining human well-being (as a whole, not anecdotes)? In the 60's, Population Bomb predicted global starvation in the 70's and 80's. Defenders of the problem as presented claim it was only wrong by timeframe. That begs the question again of when that will become a problem? Predictions are not useful if there's no time frame attached. Grossly missing the time frame also casts massive doubt on the predictor's understanding.
|
1) Your making contextual comments without providing context.
2) 'When' is probably the most important issue, as those up close and personal to the 'problems' are witnessing non-linear accelerations with positive feedback loops.
3) If you'd followed any of the actual science you wouldn't be making such uninformed comments.
4) You should no what the atmospheric concentrations are.
5) You should know what Earth was like the last time those concentrations existed.
6) If you knew, you wouldn't sleep nights.
7) And you'd be out in the streets demanding that someone do something.
8) It would only be rational.
9) There is no doubt as to what the field scientists are witnessing, and the implications.
10) Any doubt you might possess would be borne out of your own ignorance.