Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
You know, every time I look up global warming court cases they failed spectacularly.
I don't think the church of global warming has been able to win a single court case anywhere.
So that's why the believers try to scare people and manipulate people with emotion, because that's all they got.
They don't have anything actionable and they know it. They can't prove their case, can't agree on a solution and push for illogical counter intuitive bandaids to fix the problem.
|
The lawyers seem stupid.
A legal precedent was established in 1672, in England, with 'de Graaf v Swammerdan,' involving the discovery of ovaries and eggs.
No one outside the scientific community was considered fit to hear the case, so it was adjudicated at the British Royal Society, London.
In the United States there is a mechanism called ' Trial by Certificate' which shares the spirit of de Graaf v Swammerdan.
Attorneys can petition to have the case tried only at a venue where specialized knowledge of certain facts could be found.
Julianna v United States, for instance, should never have gone to a US District Court. It should have been 'tried' at the NASA - JPL, of Cal Tech, in Pomona, California. It's the only place in the USA where the 'facts' would be properly understood. Fossil-fuel industry-paid attorneys defending EXXON-MOBIL, wouldn't have an ice-cube's chance in hell of defending their client.
There's no arguing with the facts!