View Single Post
Old 10-11-2008, 01:00 PM   #197 (permalink)
Formula413
Renaissance Man
 
Formula413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Northeast dreaming of the Southwest
Posts: 596

Aegean C - '17 Honda Civic LX
90 day: 42.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blister View Post
Actually, that's a VERY unreasonable request since nowhere in this thread or any other thread did I ever say that. Hydrogen and oxygen are ALWAYS going to recombine into water... ALWAYS, which is PROOF of an inefficient burn if water vapor is a product. Reading posts is tricky sometimes. We mostly just want to see what we want to see and don't absorb the true content of what we read.

Here's an equation for you though:

H2 + FIRE (will never, ever, not in a million years) = H2.

That's FREE ENERGY and doesn't exist SO, if we say H2 + O + fire = H2O(water)... well, it's obviously BUNK and that's what some are saying.

Once again, I am stating *clearly*, whether or not the by product is helium or not, an efficient burn of H2 WILL never produce H2 and since that's 2/3rds of the contents of water, you wont get water either.

Anyway, this should be common sense but it's doesn't seem to click with some. I'm officially outta here. ("here"= this thread), another neat equation.
I am lost. When hydrogen is burned it combines with oxygen, just like gasoline combines with oxygen inside an engine and burns, forming water vapor and carbon dioxide (mostly). When you mix hydrogen and oxygen and add heat they will combine to form H2O. What is incorrect in that statement?
__________________

  Reply With Quote