Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
The question wasn't about his reputation, just the article.
Did you find the article internally self-consistent?
|
I found it intellectually dishonest!
It, in itself, isn't even something one would be so concerned about at this juncture.
And if Spencer was actually a 'climate scientist', he'd know from first principles that the carbon dioxide atmospheric concentration, or how it's represented statistically, isn't 'the' thing to worry about now.
It's why I posted about Andrew Glickson's book.
The Earth's 6th-Mass Extinction is about methane ( permafrost and sea-bed sediment clathrates ), triggered by the warming from carbon-dioxide, which is a done deal, unfolding as I type.