View Single Post
Old 10-11-2008, 04:45 PM   #18 (permalink)
MechEngVT
Mechanical Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 190

The Truck - '02 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT Sport
90 day: 13.32 mpg (US)

The Van 2 - '06 Honda Odyssey EX
90 day: 20.56 mpg (US)

GoKart - '14 Hyundai Elantra GT base 6MT
90 day: 30.24 mpg (US)

Godzilla - '21 Ford F350 XL
90 day: 8.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Concrete is right.

You can't really say that a 1.6 TD has a BSFC of 265 g/kW-hr at 1800 rpm. That statement is only true at a specific engine load that will generally be between 75% and 100& load. If this engine will put out enough available power at 1800 rpm so that your cruising load is only 50% throttle, you will be consuming far more than 265 g/kW-hr at cruise. Same goes for the 1.9 TDI.

Given that the 1.9 TDI will put out more power than the 1.6 TD at a given geared engine speed at a given road speed in the *same* vehicle (identical cruise power requirement) the 1.9 TDI will operate at a much smaller percentage of engine load than the 1.6 TD.

Since I can't locate a BSFC chart for the 1.6 TD in an amount of time I'm willing to devote to the search I can't see whether there are plausible scenarios to indicate which would be more fuel efficient in a given application. Generally engines of this size in a compact vehicle application cannot be forced to operate at a high enough load to achieve the exact operating point required to deliver peak BSFC in a cruise scenario. Put the engine in a full size truck however and you just might hit that point.
__________________
  Reply With Quote