View Single Post
Old 05-02-2022, 01:33 PM   #54 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,805

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,326
Thanked 4,476 Times in 3,441 Posts
#3 and #4 are entirely unrelated.

There will be more loss due to storms in the future because there will be much more stuff as all nations increase in wealth and population continues to grow.

Spending $400T will not prevent the $600T loss because a. storms exist regardless of climate change, and b. global climate is very slow to respond to human activity

People aren't going to be cool spending $1T per year to turn the outdoor thermostat down when some people don't have medical healthcare, or drug addicts are defiling cities. Outdoor thermostat is something you think about after all the other problems people face have been solved.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote