View Single Post
Old 05-05-2022, 03:35 PM   #15 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,260
Thanks: 24,387
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
all those lines

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
While I understand the climate is changing, the only thing I read in all those lines is insecurity. People are scared of change, especially when we cannot control it.

If the answer is to limit energy consumption (stifle progress) then its not a workable answer.
1) It's information.
2) Some of the things that field investigators have observed firsthand.
3) Those with critical thinking skills would be alarmed. Might regret past behavior. Might alter their present consumer behavior. Lower their carbon footprint. That would be exercising the little 'control' they have total control of.
4) One plan would not require any sacrifice in standard of living. No curtailment in the 'use' of energy, only a 'difference' in the 'source', the amount of 'load,' and 'efficiency' with which the energy got the job done. It would be 'seamless.'
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote