View Single Post
Old 05-16-2022, 04:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,474

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,392 Times in 3,366 Posts
Eco modes are notoriously gimmicky, but I don't know how it's implemented in the Maverick.

Often times Eco mode just makes throttle response non-linear by making it more precise (squishy) at lower throttle positions, and less precise towards the top end (twitchy). Hardly any of which has much to do with efficiency, because acceleration is only a small fraction of overall driving, and it's somewhat fuel efficient to accelerate briskly. How does making the throttle non-linear improve fuel economy when the operator is still in control of throttle percent?

Sometimes Eco mode causes an automatic to hold onto a higher gear for longer before downshifting, or upshifts sooner. This might help a little.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote