View Single Post
Old 06-02-2022, 01:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
basic shapes

1) I'm willing to face complete humiliation in front of the entire global community, if you investigate the aerodynamic streamlining template, Generation-III.
2) I have super-critical Reynolds number empirical wind tunnel test data for it from the DARKO Wind Tunnel for comparison quanta.
3) Wolf Heinrich Hucho has presented data for other 'basic bodies', dating to 1922.
4) Rolf Buchheim et al's 1981 testing results at the Volkswagen AG, climatic wind tunnel, for basic bodies tested by PhD candidate, Wolfgang Klemperer, in 1922, at the Zeppelin Werke happen to be exactly the same Cds.
5) In, SAE Paper 2020-01-0673, PhD Jeff Howell et al, mentioned that, as of 2020, 'it is remarkable , however, how little data is available on the effects of streamlined tails on non-axisymmetric bodies, whether representative of road vehicles or not.'
6) This would be an opportunity to add to the body of knowledge.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7) As of 2017, I posted a 4-view- representation of the scale-model tested in Utah.
Thanks for considering it. I'm sure that certain parties would love to experience schadenfruede if the numbers didn't stand up.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote