View Single Post
Old 10-14-2008, 07:07 PM   #106 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,905

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,473
Thanked 2,946 Times in 1,841 Posts
Hi Dave,

Can you show any peer reviewed publications in recognized scientific publications, that go against the general conclusion that human activity is a major cause of global climate change? And if you can show some, can you show that they were not funded (directly or indirectly) by Exxon Mobil or some other energy company?

Paraphrasing from "Cradle to Cradle": DuPont, British Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, Ford, Daimler Chrysler, Texaco, and General Motors all withdrew from the Global Climate Coalition, which is a group backed by industrialists that discount global warming.

Why did they withdraw, I wonder? Why did political appointees in the White House edit science reports from NASA and the EPA?

Now, why would the White House want to censor scientists?
Sincerely, Neil

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 10-14-2008 at 08:46 PM.. Reason: added links
  Reply With Quote