Thread: Solar power
View Single Post
Old 08-08-2022, 03:45 PM   #210 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,746

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
The wafer fab I worked at did everything in that video, except lithography. I was there when they added the 300mm fab process, keeping the 200mm process.

The 200mm process had people shuffling wafers manually using carts like in the video, even moving them between separate buildings.

The 300mm process was contained in a contiguous building and OHT (overhead transport) was used. Wafers were rarely manually handled. The pullers were way more complex than the 200mm ones. The quartz crucibles could only be used twice because part of their function was to absorb oxygen, and it could only do this effectively twice. Supercooled, superconducting magnets were also used to reduce oxygen content.

The company was considering expanding the 200mm process around when I left a little over 5 years ago. To do so, they would have to expand their building floor space. I thought it crazy to expand the old process back then, but now maybe it wasn't such a crazy idea.

I kinda think we need to be printing PV, not using billion dollar fabs to make inflexible wafers. Hopefully that technology pans out.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote