View Single Post
Old 10-17-2008, 12:43 AM   #165 (permalink)
roflwaffle
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I think the utilities have their billing structure bass-ackwards. The residential customer that uses the least amount of electricity pays proportionally the HIGHEST "facilities charges" and the HIGHEST amount/kwh. AND I just got notice that my utility is requesting rate increases which will hit the- you guessed it- small residential customer the hardest, with both higher facilities charges and "distribution charges" for the small user than the big one. Soooo... the rewards go to the biggest users? The economic incentives to conserve are what? (besides just paying for less kilowatts).

I think the utilities should provide incentive in the other direction. Say, if you consistently reduce usage over a 12 mo period, or use less than "average", or ? Gimme a break on my facilities charge, or distribution charge, or gimme a free appliance inspection, or window plastic kit, or SOMETHING, for having reduced my average consumption by nearly 50% over what it used to be!
We have exactly what you're talking about here in CA. The people that use the most get charged the most, and we're talking about a big difference too, something like a ~10+c/kWh increase for each tier. For instance we're at ~8-10c/kWh for the first ~200-400kWh/month, but after that it jumps to 17-19c/kWh, then ~30c/kWh, etc...
  Reply With Quote