View Single Post
Old 12-03-2022, 09:08 PM   #32 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,817

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post
The question is how much efficiency is lost to "oversizing" the engine (compared to steady flat cruising needs) and how much would be lost to a hybrid system.

Looking at this graph, if we assume the car needs a steady 15kW (about 20hp) of power to cruise at a steady highway speed, it would use at best 260g/kWh (about 32.4% efficient) with perfect gearing. But the most efficient the engine would be would be 245g/kWh (about 34.4% efficient) and would give at most 58kW (about 78hp) of power at that efficiency (with perfect gearing). The most power the engine could produce is about 85kW (114hp) but would use around 300g/kWh (28.1%) with perfect gearing.

But if you were to extrapolate the numbers to accomodate a +200hp engine then it could easily fall to the 300g/kWh ring just cruising.

I'm not sure I'm tracking your question entirely.

Maybe it would be best to target peak efficiency of the engine at 30 HP so it could cover steady cruise plus a tiny bit of battery charging, but allow the engine to operate outside of peak efficiency if there's high demand, like ascending a hill or driving 90 MPH. ICE perform reasonably efficiently even at high output, it's just the low output where they are abysmal.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote