|
I like the idea of gauges with simple 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. numbering. Even 10, 20, 30, 40, etc. is fine to me. It's the gauges that use 5's (5, 15, 25, 35) or that skip numbers (20, 40, 60, 80) that are hard for me to read and understand, unless the needle is exactly on that number. But when it's on the line between 40 and 60, I will think I'm going 45mph in stead of 50mph.
I don't mind that fuel mileage is displayed digitally, although I find it quite meaningly to see instant fuel mileage, digital or analog. I'd rather see the average fuel mileage, in which case having a decimal is nice.
__________________
|