View Single Post
Old 04-02-2023, 06:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Here are a few questions I have, since I see there are not that many posted in the thread:
Blunt fronts, versus pointy front ends.
These two cars have the exact same cD ( nevermind cDxA in this example )


This car you tested had a .201 cD

, yet this other one had a .21 cD - so actually higher !

Of what importance is a "pointy" front end at normal road speeds ?
How does the increase in pressure on a blunt front effect drag ?
In these examples, the car has a very blunt front :

How does the air stay attached with such sharp edges at the corners ? ( in green )


And on this other car, how does air remain attached, despite the flat, upright windshield ?


On the example Camaro above, there is also a large portion of the tire exposed to the wind ( in green on the image ) Gary tested some side spats that one would think would deflect air away fron this area, yet they did not change the cD.

Finally, since the Lexus LS430 had such a good cD ( the .25 example at the start ) yet has a 3 box design, could the car do even better with a boattail ?
( silly looking, yes, but as an example )

All these questions have been covered on this forum , but I would like your opinions as well.
- Thanks !
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20230402_164241.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	49.4 KB
ID:	33645   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-160612_Chrome.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	86.6 KB
ID:	33646   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-170112_Gallery.jpg
Views:	171
Size:	220.5 KB
ID:	33647   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-165317_Chrome.jpg
Views:	163
Size:	145.9 KB
ID:	33648   Click image for larger version

Name:	20230402_163617.jpg
Views:	158
Size:	149.0 KB
ID:	33649  

Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-164221_ArtFlow.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	174.1 KB
ID:	33650   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-161229_Chrome.jpg
Views:	162
Size:	35.2 KB
ID:	33651   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-161551_Chrome.jpg
Views:	166
Size:	36.6 KB
ID:	33652   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20230402-163502_ArtFlow.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	77.4 KB
ID:	33653  
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
pgfpro (04-05-2023), Piwoslaw (04-15-2023)