View Single Post
Old 04-22-2023, 12:30 PM   #65 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,482

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,219
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
It was explained several times: BSFC has nothing to do with throttle-stop testing since throttle-stop testing does not use fuel consumption as a measurement parameter.
No, it was not explained at all, ever. A change in BSFC at a given throttle position necessarily results in a difference in power output, and therefore speed. Just because fuel consumption is not being measured doesn't mean a change in BSFC is irrelevant.

Someone insisting something incorrect has still failed to answer the question.

Quote:
Throttle-stop testing works on the principle that for a given throttle opening and over small changes in engine RPM, torque output is nearly constant.

Power is torque * RPM / 5252. A change in engine RPM at a given torque necessarily means the power output is changing.

Quote:
On a vehicle with fixed transmission gear ratios, constant torque = constant force at the wheels, so a change in drag force will show up as a change in speed, and the ratio of the squares of each speed will be equal to the ratio of each drag area. That's it. No BSFC. Has nothing to do with this type of test.
Horsepower determines speed, not torque. Since a changing RPM affects how efficiently fuel is burned, and therefore power output at any particular torque, it must affect speed non-linearly.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote