View Single Post
Old 10-23-2023, 11:53 AM   #25 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,279
Thanks: 24,401
Thanked 7,368 Times in 4,767 Posts
'airtabs'

I don't think so.
The windshield header is already submerged within a favorable pressure gradient, as far back as the roof apex.
And, as far as the CFD suggesting that flow is separated there, I don't believe that to be the case.
It's just a very strong suction peak, and very strong pressure spike, which lowers the ability of the boundary-layer, rear of the roof apex, to withstand the adverse pressure gradient of the fast falling roofline, triggering the flow separation we see in Volkswagen's wind tunnel photos.
Hucho wrote a comprehensive explanation of how beneficial it is to 'soften' that area of the body, with respect to its affect on flow adhesion downstream.
Dr.-Ing. Eberhardt, who designed ROVOMOBIL was no doubt aware of what his 48.5-degree windshield slant could do.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rain, 'over-shooting' the header is more about the inertia/momentum of denser water, compared to air. The air would have no trouble rounding that intersection.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 10-23-2023 at 11:56 AM.. Reason: add data
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
freebeard (10-23-2023), Piotrsko (10-24-2023)