View Single Post
Old 12-11-2023, 12:29 PM   #89 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
' less... better? '

Quote:
Originally Posted by JacobLeSann View Post
freebeard, hah! I wish. I’ve had a 2008 Coupe I bought for wheels/tires. Strange guy sold it to me and I realize it may not have been his. Thankfully everything is in good condition, just a hacked off catalytic converter and no keys. Was dirt cheap.

aerohead, I’ve noticed chevy’s racing divisions recommend similar heats. I wonder why. Wouldn’t less be better for a racing car?
In engineering, and from thermodynamics, the highest thermal efficiencies for heat engines are achieved with the greatest delta- T between the upper operating temp, and the 'sink' temperature.
In automotive engines, the highest operating temperatures are constrained by thermo-chemical disassociation of the hydrocarbons used to lubricate the reciprocating components, and by the thermal expansion coefficients and metallurgical operating limits of components exposed to the heat of combustion, along with all the dynamic forces, loads, stresses, strain, jerk, etc..
You take everything you can right to the 'limit.'
You get the lowest pumping losses ( parasitic losses ), and extract the greatest amount of useful work for a given heat input.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
JacobLeSann (12-12-2023), Piotrsko (12-12-2023)