View Single Post
Old 01-08-2024, 11:45 AM   #10 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,914
Thanks: 24,000
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
'why'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phase View Post
Yes I like that one. It’s pretty low to the ground and there’s no wheel arch gap. So I’m curious to how stiff the suspension is and how that handles bumps and drops. Literally no room for the wheels to move. But cool design

I’m curious to why the chery has a lower CD than the second post I showed with the long boat tail tear drop car
I'm going to wait and see if technical images ( blueprints ) of the cars show up online.
There are at least nine metrics I like to be in possession of, in order to facilitate an evaluation of any specific vehicle.
The GAC ENO.146 used the 1981 Volkswagen-Flow Body upper body contour, which appears to be remarkably more conservative than that of the newer GAC TIME.
This is the most important feature on an automobile, and determines whether there's a 'favorable', or 'adverse' pressure gradient.
It's easy to get this wrong, and end up snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote