View Single Post
Old 01-22-2024, 10:32 PM   #119 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,549
Thanks: 8,091
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts

On the one hand you have environmentalists stirring the pot, OTOH there is this:
Quote:
3:22 If someone claims that plants will benefit from the sudden change of climate zones, then that’s
3:27 scientific misinformation alright. If someone says that they’re not worried about climate change and
3:33 more worried about energy shortages, then that’s their opinion
Whether plants benefit from the knock-on effects of increased CO2 would be a [human-centric] opinion; would it not?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote