View Single Post
Old 03-16-2024, 07:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
j-c-c
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 392
Thanks: 65
Thanked 163 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
1) That would imply induced-drag, antithetical to 'aerodynamics.'
2) Downforce isn't an issue with passenger cars, so we'd be wasting energy to fix a problem which never existed!
'Folly' !
I agree, two main sources of aero drag I see here, induced drag on the car body by maybe adding air where it disturbs the existing proper/acceptable air flow, and rotational air drag of the rotating wheel. Removing under car air for DF is most efficient energy wise achieved passively I believe. A wheel design for such task unfortunately is fixed, and unable to be tweaked as needed for the operating conditions. It was a solution on race cars in late 70's and faded away, for reasons I am uncertain about.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to j-c-c For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-16-2024)