I didn't recognize the reframing of the questions because I didn't dwell on each one. Some tests give a better result if you give an initial reaction rather than over-thinking each answer. an example is Briggs-Myer (I'm an INTJ); have you taken that one? It would be of interest to take the Compass Test twice, once answering Agree 100% of the time, once with Disagree -- to see where the results would fall. Then Strongly Agree and Strongly Disagree.
Odd that you come back to a thread when you have no interest in the subject.
Obvs you have no exposure to R. B. Fuller. His analysis would be fourth dimensional. Four at 60%, not three at 90%. I know you haven't read Synergetics, but have you even looked at it?
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1EnZV73mlL.jpg
The test's usefulness
is that it's two dimensional, to break people out of the one-dimensional paradigm. Further cross-axes are possible but people tap out. Large Language Models use millions of parameters.